The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World by Paul Roberts ©2004

Host: Matt

Date: August 2006

Judges Score: Has production peaked? Is demand inelastic ($3/gallon)? What are you going do about it?

Food & Drink: Beer & Pizza… Matt tries to lower the standards.

Other sources:

6 Responses to “#02 – The End of Oil”

  1. 1 Matt H. May 9, 2007 at 11:58 pm

    A good read about potential alternative energy sources… but quite a rollercoaster, where every chapter gets you excited about the promise of a new energy source only to deflate you with the reality of the current state of the technology.

  2. 2 Dave K. May 14, 2007 at 2:49 pm

    Just got done watching “Who Killed the Electric Car?”… Like this book, it is an eye-opening expose on the effects of greed, short-sightedness, and resistance to change we so prevalently see helming the ship of progress.

    While the apparent effects of the death of the electric car aren’t as bleak as those described in The End of Oil, it eulogizes the need for us, as consumers and as citizens of this country and planet, to become more aware of, if not active in, the means by which we can make the world a better place for those that come after us.

    As a bonus (and a correlation between the two), Paul Roberts, author of The End of Oil, makes a couple appearances in the movie. I highly recommend renting this!

  3. 3 Matt H. May 14, 2007 at 8:45 pm

    Holy shit Batman… gas is back to $3.35/gallon for 89 octane! Sure glad we didn’t buy an SUV… but not so sure we want the V6 sadans either. An interesting start blow on explaining gas prices.

  4. 4 Matt H. May 24, 2007 at 10:55 am

    Pretty cool stuff coming out of BWM… they just release 100 of their Hydrogen 7 cars. Powered by a 260hp 12-cylinder engine, the Hydrogen 7 accelerates from zero to 62mph in 9.5 seconds before going on to an electronically limited 143mph top speed. The dual power technology means the car has a cruising range in excess of 125 miles in the hydrogen mode with a further 300 miles under petrol power. Check out the AutoblogGreen Article.

  5. 5 tbone24oz July 17, 2008 at 9:07 am

    It looks like our friend, Bill, is going to have a lot of lobbying work in the coming decade. Take a look at this:

    Gore sets ‘moon shot’ goal on climate change
    By RON FOURNIER – 5 hours ago (July 17 2008)

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Just as John F. Kennedy set his sights on the moon, Al Gore is challenging the nation to produce every kilowatt of electricity through wind, sun and other Earth-friendly energy sources within 10 years, an audacious goal he hopes the next president will embrace.

    The Nobel Prize-winning former vice president said fellow Democrat Barack Obama and Republican rival John McCain are “way ahead” of most politicians in the fight against global climate change.

    Rising fuel costs, climate change and the national security threats posed by U.S. dependence on foreign oil are conspiring to create “a new political environment” that Gore said will sustain bold and expensive steps to wean the nation off fossil fuels.

    “I have never seen an opportunity for the country like the one that’s emerging now,” Gore told The Associated Press in an interview previewing a speech on global warming he was to deliver Thursday in Washington.

    Gore said he fully understands the magnitude of the challenge.

    The Alliance for Climate Protection, a bipartisan group that he chairs, estimates the cost of transforming the nation to so-called clean electricity sources at $1.5 trillion to $3 trillion over 30 years in public and private money. But he says it would cost about as much to build ozone-killing coal plants to satisfy current demand.

    “This is an investment that will pay itself back many times over,” Gore said. “It’s an expensive investment but not compared to the rising cost of continuing to invest in fossil fuels.”

    Called an alarmist by conservatives, Gore has made combatting global warming his signature issue, a campaign that has been recognized worldwide — from an Academy Award to a Nobel Prize. He portrayed Thursday’s speech as the latest and most important phase in his effort to build public opinion in favor of alternative fuels.

    He knows politicians fear to act unless voters are willing to sacrifice — and demand new fuels.

    “I hope to contribute to a new political environment in this country that will allow the next president to do what I think the next president is going to think is the right thing to do,” Gore said. “But the people have to play a part.” He likened his challenge to Kennedy’s pledge in May 1961 to land a man on the moon by the end of the decade.

    Gore narrowly lost the presidential race in 2000 to then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush after a campaign in which his prescient views on climate change took a back seat to other issues. While dismissing a suggestion that he pulled his punches eight years ago, Gore said his goal now is to “enlarge the political space” within which politicians can “deal with the climate challenge.”

    To meet his 10-year goal, Gore said nuclear energy output would continue at current levels while the nation dramatically increases its use of solar, wind, geothermal and so-called clean coal energy. Huge investments must also be made in technologies that reduce energy waste and link existing grids, he said.

    If the nation fails to act, the cost of oil will continue to rise as fast-growing China and India increase demand, Gore said. Sustained addiction to oil also will place the nation at the mercy of oil-producing regimes, he said, and the globe would suffer irreparable harm.

    Government experts recently predicted that, at the current rate, world energy demand will grow 50 percent over the next two decades. The Energy Information Administration also said in its long-range forecast to 2030 that the world is not close to abandoning fossil fuels despite their effect on global warming.

    While electricity production is only part of the nation’s energy and climate change problem, Gore said, “If we meet this challenge we will solve the rest of it.”

  6. 6 Matt H. July 17, 2008 at 12:51 pm

    There has to be room for “clean coal” doesn’t there? I mean we have this SH#@ coming out of our ears in the U.S. – what else are we going to do with it?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Top Posts

Blog Stats

  • 91,973 hits

%d bloggers like this: