Archive for the '2008 election' Category



Payroll/Income Tax vs. Capital Gains Tax

A couple of Broken Spines members were talking Friday night with an old friend who revealed that she was supporting McCain and that she had supported Bush in the 2004 election.  The conversation went to taxes and we were discussing the “inequity” of the payroll/income tax vs. capital gains tax.  A suggestion was made that we need to move to a single tax rate avoiding the loopholes for the wealthy in our current tax structure.  We discussed Warren Buffett’s philosophy that the system isn’t fair to the middle class that his income is taxed at a lower rate than the people that he employs (their average rate is 32.9% vs. Buffett’s rate of 17.7%.).

Check out Buffet’s interview with Tom Brokow where he explains how US tax policy has tilted toward the rich and away from the middle class for the last 10 years.  Decide for yourself…

Advertisements

The Palin Culture Wars

I’ve been hardpressed to decide if the Palin choice was sheer stupidity, utter genius, or simply ironic.  Frankly I hope it’s the last.

Here’s an interesting set of articles for the liberal elitists, first from our friends at the Wall Street Journal.

Continue reading ‘The Palin Culture Wars’

Do voters really vote in their self interest?

In conversations about the recent election I wondered how much people really vote in their self interest.  I came across an interesting article from earlier this year that I thought I would share.  The story from Bryan Caplan of the Washington Post suggests that there are 5 myths of voting.

  1. People vote in their self interests
  2. Unselfish voting will solve our problems
  3. Voters’ errors balance out
  4. Political disagreement is all about values
  5. Voters want serious change

My question is that if these are all myths then when someone invokes one as their reason for voting for a certain candidate what are they really voting for?  For example, when someone invokes that they are voting for McCain out of self interest… why are they really voting for them?  Fear, hatred, prejudice?  What are the underlying issues?

Doublespeak In the Post-Fact Society

One of our fair readers posted an interesting comment on the McCain campaign and Republicans in general with the following observations:

  • They invent death from the sky and call it a Patriot Missile.
  • They rape the environment and call it the “Healthy Forests Initiative”
  • They spy on Americans and call it the “Patriot Act.”
  • Now they put up Bush in bra and call it “change!”

This got me to thinking that Republicans are just better at Doublespeak (coined by Orwell, defined by Wikipedia as “language constructed to disguise or distort its actual meaning often resulting in a communication bypass”).  But, maybe the American electorate aren’t looking for “actual meaning” – rather close approximations of truth and reality.

Farhad Manjoo writes in his book “True Enough”:

Facts are a stock of faltering value.  The phenomenon that scholars call “media fragmentation” – the disintegration of the mass media  into the many niches of the Web, cable news, and talk radio – lets us consume news that we like and avoid news that we don’t, leading people to receive reality in a way the conforms  to the long-held beliefs…it’s clear that the McCain camp is benefiting from some of these forces.  [also, see Swift Boat Veterans for Truth]

The question is whether or not Obama should sink to this level and if he can do so effectively.  So far, it appears that scrutiny and fact checking on Palin’s background is only making her stronger (and keeping her and the McCain campaign on the front pages – where is Biden?) by calling attention to the “larger truths” that she’s new, she’s popular in Alaska, and she’s an insurgent. 

Since when did “lies” and “the truth” become synonyms? Since the GOP came to town!

A few things have been bothering me with this week’s GOP convention in my home town of St. Paul, Minnesota… there were several speeches where I knew that the pundits were lying and I had to ask myself “Since when did it become acceptable to LIE to the American public on national television?”

Well, I wasn’t the only one who had issue with the statements… so were the Momocrats!

·         First – Mike Huckabee:  “And speaking of Governor Palin, I am so tired of hearing about her lack of experience. I want to tell you folks something. She got more votes running for mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, than Joe Biden got running for president of the United States.”  Sarah Palin received more votes for major in Alaska than Biden got for President of the United States?  – False, Sarah got 909 from her town of 5,469 and Joe got 79,754 before dropping out after Iowa.

·         Second – Sarah Palin: “But listening to him speak, it’s easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform – not even in the state senate.”  – False, Barack has sponsored (or co-sponsored) more than 823 bills while in the Illinois State Senate on health care, poverty, crime, civil rights, ethics, the environment, gun control, and immigration.

Cynical Choice of Sarah

Maureen Dowd (only my favorite columnist ever) imagines Sarah Palin in a chick-flick where, naturally, McCain chokes on a pretzel and dies on day one:

The movie ends with the former beauty queen shaking out her pinned-up hair, taking off her glasses, slipping on ruby red peep-toe platform heels that reveal a pink French-style pedicure, and facing down Vladimir Putin in an island in the Bering Strait. Putting away her breast pump, she points her rifle and informs him frostily that she has some expertise in Russia because it’s close to Alaska. “Back off, Commie dude,” she says. “I’m a much better shot than Cheney.”

Then she takes off in her seaplane and lands on the White House lawn, near the new ice fishing hole and hockey rink. The “First Dude,” as she calls the hunky Eskimo in the East Wing, waits on his snowmobile with the kids — Track (named after high school track meets), Bristol (after Bristol Bay where they did commercial fishing), Willow (after a community in Alaska), Piper (just a cool name) and Trig (Norse for “strength.”)

“The P.T.A. is great preparation for dealing with the K.G.B.,” President Palin murmurs to Todd, as they kiss in the final scene while she changes Trig’s diaper. “Now that Georgia’s safe, how ’bout I cook you up some caribou hot dogs and moose stew for dinner, babe?”

Sarah Palin for VP? Are you kidding me?

Is it just me or does John McCain seem to be grasping at straws here?  He chooses a 44 year old governor of Alaska that hasn’t had any national or international political experience as his Number Two?  As a matter of fact, she has not even seen two years in office as Governor!  John McCain has bashed Barack Obama for his lack of experience yet would leave the fate of the country in the hands of a novice if he fell ill?  I find it an interesting gamble for McCain… an opportunity to court the female Hillary Clinton supporter but her stance on the issues is the exact opposite of Hillary: she is against a woman’s right to choose an abortion, she is pro-death penalty, and she opposes same sex marriages (while claiming to have gay friends) enough to support a constitutional amendment barring benefits for same sex couples, and she supports the war in Iraq.  An interesting insight from colleague and State Senate President Lyda Green, a Republican who has often feuded with Palin, remarked, “She’s not prepared to be governor. How can she be prepared to be vice president or president?”  Would a woman vote for her just because she is a woman… even if she disagreed with her politics?


Pages

Blog Stats

  • 91,836 hits
Advertisements